Rights come alive - Tan Eng Hong v AG
A couple of days ago I wrote a post on the legal significance of the Court of Appeal decision in Tan Eng Hong v AG (2012). The point that I highlighted was on the interpretation of Article 4 of our Constitution. This is a follow-up post. There is another significant ruling made by the Court of Appeal in this case and it would have far reaching consequences for other Constitutional cases. The Court of Appeal has effectively stated that in some instances, the very existence of an unconstitutional law is sufficient to give rise to the violation of constitutional rights. The AG was contending that there must be a present prosecution under the particular law before it can be asserted that there was a violation of constitutional rights. The Court of Appeal has flatly rejected this: " At the same time, and for the avoidance of doubt, we state conclusively that we also reject the proposition that a subsisting prosecution under an allegedly unconstitutional ...